Disparity Between Indications for and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Asian Patients With Heart Failure.

نویسندگان

  • Yvonne May Fen Chia
  • Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng
  • Eugene S J Tan
  • Wan Ting Tay
  • A Mark Richards
  • Calvin Woon Loong Chin
  • Wataru Shimizu
  • Sang Weon Park
  • Chung-Lieh Hung
  • Lieng H Ling
  • Tachapong Ngarmukos
  • Razali Omar
  • Bambang B Siswanto
  • Calambur Narasimhan
  • Eugene B Reyes
  • Cheuk-Man Yu
  • Inder Anand
  • Michael R MacDonald
  • Jonathan Yap
  • Shu Zhang
  • Eric A Finkelstein
  • Carolyn S P Lam
چکیده

BACKGROUND Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are lifesaving devices for patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction. However, utilization and determinants of ICD insertion in Asia are poorly defined. We determined the utilization, associations of ICD uptake, patient-perceived barriers to device therapy and, impact of ICDs on mortality in Asian patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS Using the prospective ASIAN-HF (Asian Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure) registry, 5276 patients with symptomatic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from 11 Asian regions and across 3 income regions (high: Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan; middle: China, Malaysia, and Thailand; and low: India, Indonesia, and Philippines) were studied. ICD utilization, clinical characteristics, as well as device perception and knowledge, were assessed at baseline among ICD-eligible patients (EF ≤35% and New York Heart Association Class II-III). Patients were followed for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality. Among 3240 ICD-eligible patients (mean age 58.9±12.9 years, 79.1% men), 389 (12%) were ICD recipients. Utilization varied across Asia (from 1.5% in Indonesia to 52.5% in Japan) with a trend toward greater uptake in regions with government reimbursement for ICDs and lower out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure. ICD (versus non-ICD) recipients were more likely to be older (63±11 versus 58±13 year; P<0.001), have tertiary (versus ≤primary) education (34.9% versus 18.1%; P<0.001) and be residing in a high (versus low) income region (64.5% versus 36.5%; P<0.001). Among 2000 ICD nonrecipients surveyed, 55% were either unaware of the benefits of, or needed more information on, device therapy. ICD implantation reduced risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.97) and sudden cardiac deaths (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.79) over a median follow-up of 417 days. CONCLUSIONS ICDs reduce mortality risk, yet utilization in Asia is low; with disparity across geographic regions and socioeconomic status. Better patient education and targeted healthcare reforms in extending ICD reimbursement may improve access. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01633398. Unique identifier: NCT01633398.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: More Work to Be Done.

Disparity Between Indications for and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Asian Patients With Heart Failure Yvonne May Fen Chia, BSc (Pharm), MD; Tiew-Hwa Katherine Teng, MPH, PhD; Eugene S.J. Tan, MBBS; Wan Ting Tay, MAppStat; A. Mark Richards, MD, PhD; Calvin Woon Loong Chin, MD, PhD; Wataru Shimizu, MD, PhD; Sang Weon Park, MD, PhD; Chung-Lieh Hung, MD; Lieng H. Ling, M...

متن کامل

Over, Under, or Just Right? How do we interpret ICD utilization in the modern era?

Over 5 million individuals are afflicted with heart failure in the United States per year. [1] Current guidelines based on the MADITI and II, MUSTT and SCDHeFT trials recommend the use of pharmacologic as well as implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy as Class I indications for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in a subgroup of patients (depending on their ejection frac...

متن کامل

Overview of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure management.

Clinical trials have established the benefits of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in the treatment of heart failure patients. As adjuncts to guideline-directed medical therapy, ICDs confer mortality benefits from sudden cardiac arrest, while CRT reduces mortality, hospitalisation rates and improves functional capacity. This review discus...

متن کامل

Double valve replacement in a patient with implantable cardioverter defibrillator with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Recent data from landmark trials suggest that the indications for cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are set to expand to include heart failure, sleep-disordered breathing, and possibly routine implantation in patients with myocardial infarction and poor ventricular function.[1] This will inevitably result in more patients with cardiac devices undergoing surgeries...

متن کامل

Racial and gender trends in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among Medicare beneficiaries between 1997 and 2003.

Differences in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been reported, but the extent to which they have widened after the publication of major clinical trials supporting their use is unclear. Using data on Medicare beneficiaries, the authors determined annual age-standardized population-based utilization rates of ICDs for white men, black men, white women, and black women...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes

دوره 10 11  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017